Part 3: Does a Patent Really 'Reach' a Medical AI Service? The Architecture That Decides [Paid]
In 2025, Japan's Supreme Court signaled that 'even if the server is abroad, a patent can reach it when the use is substantively domestic.' But does that ruler fit the next generation of services? The Dwango v. FC2 case concerned a fairly simple feature: streaming video comments. A serious medical-AI web service is a different animal—real-time inference, persistent state, giant models, and multi-stage GPU pipelines spread across regions. This piece compares the two at the level of system architecture, mapping where the Court's 'totality-of-circumstances' test bites hardest, and where a service might slip out of reach.
Read the full article
This is a premium article. A membership ($10/mo) unlocks every article (plus the full-series PDF once a series is complete), or buy just this one for $2 (48 hours), or the whole series for $7 (60 days; the full-series PDF is downloadable once all parts are published).
Please log in or sign up to subscribe or buy.
Log in / Sign up →
![Part 2: Can a Server Abroad Still Escape a Patent? Inside the Landmark Dwango v. FC2 Ruling [Paid]](/static/images/blog/fig/fig-medai-web-patent-strategy-2-cross-border-data-hero.png)
![Part 3: Does a Patent Really 'Reach' a Medical AI Service? The Architecture That Decides [Paid]](/static/images/blog/fig/fig-medai-web-patent-strategy-3-p3-hero.png)
![Why Only a "Handful of Companies" Reaped Enormous Profits from mRNA Vaccines —— How Patent Strategy Decided Pharmaceutical Supremacy [Paid]](/static/images/blog/ai/mrna-dominant-design.png)
